The Politics Of If

We all know the type. We all know somene who is always saying “things would be better if….” Things would be better if I had a different job, things would be better if I lived somewhere else, things would be better if I had  nicer car. Well my friends, the Democrats are playing the politics of things would be better if.

Just look at what they are doing right now in Congress. Things would be better if the government payed for everyone’s health care. Things would be better if we had renewable energy. Things would be better if CEO pay was less.  Things would be better if the rest of the world liked us more. Things would be better if Gitmo was closed.

The problem with “things would be better if,” is that they never are better.  The people I know who are like that always find something else that they need to change and they often end up worse off because of the changes they made. If all thechages never make their lives better, why should we trust that the government is going to be able to do any different.

And yet they push forward.  Today Harry Reid announced that the Senate may use a procedural trick to pass health care without lawmakers even voting directly on the plan. Instead he is going to attach the plan as an amendment to anothe bill and pass that bill instead. And he is planning on doing next week.

We are in danger of losing our freedom,and it is all being done in the name of  “things will be better if.” We are seeing the Constitution being trampled right in front of our eyes, and it is all being done in the name of “things will be better if.” It seems that the only way that things will be better is if we get conservatives who will stand by their principles in office and do it as quickly as possible.

Published in:Uncategorized |on September 30th, 2009 |No Comments »

The Hijacking of 9/11

It has been eight years since the tragic events of September 11th, 2001. For the first seven years we were told that we couldn’t talk about it or have any major remembrances of the event. Well folks, now enough time has gone by, at least according to many on the left.

Nancy Pelosi is now calling on America to remember those who fell on 9/11 by redoubling our efforts to pass national health care. Barack Obama has annonced that we should use 9/11 as a national day of service by “greening our neighborhoods.” Many celebrities have planned “memorial” concerts and events to raise awreness and money for their pet liberal causes. 

All of them claim that we need to have the same wake up call today that we had on 9/11. They are right but it is not a wake call to push for some political goal. We need a wake up call to remind us that our way of life and even our life itself  is fragile. We need a reminder that we need to live like we are going to die, because we are.   Perhaps most importantly we need a reminder that we are not as divided a country as we sometimes feel we are.

If anything 9/11 should be a reminder that we can and should rise above the petty politics that often consumes us. The people who attacked us did not attack us because they didn’t like our policy on public medicine or the stimulus or because we don’t have “sensible” gun control.  They attacked us because they had been taught irrational hatred for the very existance of this country. 9/11 should be a wake up call, but it should be a wake up call that we need to draw closer together, not a time to use the political wedges to push us apart.

Published in:Uncategorized |on August 31st, 2009 |No Comments »

Edward Kennedy R.I.P.

Senator Edward Kennedy passed away yesterday.  This man did more to advance liberalism in this country than pretty much any other Democrat in Congress.  Because of the tragedy that seemed to haunt his family, all you had to do was attach Teddy’s name to a bill and it would pass for purely sentimental reasons.

Ironically, Senator Kennedy’s most long lasting legacy may be the one that he didn’t want. Back in 2004,  when John Forbes Kerry was running for president, Sen. Kennedy used his influence to get the Massachusetts state legislature to pass a bill striping the governor, then Republican Mitt Romney, of the power to appoint a replacement to the Senate. At the time it was a very pragmatic political decision.

Today, that effort may turn out to be Sen. Kennedy’s biggest blunder. Until a special election can be held in November, under the laws of Massachusetts, Sen. Kennedy’s seat will remain empty. This creates a slight shift in the balance of power in the Senate. It means that the Democrats no longer have a filibuster proof majority and that the growing cracks in the Democrat party are going to become even more stressed.

It also means that the special election that is going to take place will perhaps be a prelude to next year’s midterm election. Everyone will expect the Democrats to hold that seat, it has been Democrat since 1953 when Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. lost the seat to John Kennedy.  However, Sen. Kennedy seemed to know something the rest of us don’t because he spent the last few weeks of his life pushing to have the law, that he originally pushed, repealed.

Perhaps we are  about to see a revitalization of the Republican Party, and more importantly the conservative movement. Senator Kennedy seemed to think so. We can all see the anger tha is building in the country and the way that the Democrats are responding to it. Rather than accepting that there is legitimate concern and anger of the waste and wild spending in Washington, they are calling the American people angry mobs, comparing them to the KKK and Nazis, and telling them to sit down and shut up. The Democrats are rapidly becoming the authoritarians that they accuse Republicans of being. Perhaps Sen. Kennedy’s legacy will be the start of the next Republican revolution.

Published in:Uncategorized |on August 26th, 2009 |No Comments »

More Change On The Way?

From 2002 to 2008 the Democrat mantra was that they would restore fiscal responsibility to Washington. They constantly belittled and berated President Bush for turning surpluses into deficits. If they were elected then they would get the government back on track and give us budget surpluses again. Today they proved that this is the biggest joke anyone in Washington has ever told.

The White House and Capital Hill both released their budget projections for the next ten years today and in both versions, they are projecting the largest deficits ever in the history of the United States.   Meanwhile they are still pushing the tired old lines about pay as you go and the various health care plans being deficit neutral. Now any honest person knows what this means.

Congress and the president are on a spending spree of ridiculous proportions. To say that they are spending like drunken sailors is an insult to drunks and sailors everywhere in the world. Meanwhile they are telling us to not worry because they can and will pay for it all. There is only one way to pay for the most massive deficits ever, and that is going to be with the most massive tax increase ever.

We already are tied with Japan for the highest corporate tax rate in the world. What we can really expect is that we will achieve Belgium like personal tax rates where most people pay between 50-60% of their personal income in taxes. Some Democrats in Congress, like Barney Frank, earlier in the year floated a trial balloon of having a top marginal rate of 80-100% for the top 5% of wage earners.

Now some of you may think that is a good thing, but here is the dirty little secret. The rich that most people think would get soaked, like Paris Hilton, aren’t wage earners, they get their money through trust funds and interest earning accounts. That means the spoiled rich that constantly contribute to Democrats, seeming against their own best interest, are actually not going to be affected by this tax hike.

This is enough to make even a rational guy like me join the tax revolt movement. Enough is enough, we can’t take any more of this. Nearly every country in the world that has tried this is backing away from it. Even Sweden, which once had the most inclusive social welfare network in the world has said we can’t maintain it. Meanwhile Barack Obama andthe Democrats are taking us down the very same road that countries who have been down it before are saying “don’t go, you won’t like where it leads.” We have to stand up and say stop. We have to get  true conservatives into office as quickly as possible. The time for apathy has passed, it is now to to be men and women of action.

PS: Stop calling Barack Obama and his health care plan socialist. Socialism is when the power and the plan reside in the hands of the people. Obama is not a socialist, he is an authoritarian statest.

Published in:Uncategorized |on August 25th, 2009 |No Comments »

What Happened To Patriotism?

Remember just two short years ago? The Democrats announced that disent was the highest form of patriotism. Hillary Clinton shrieked that “it is our right to debate and disagree.” My how times have changed.

Today, anyone who is opposed to the official party line, as expressed by our glorious leader, is a racist and a Nazi. Just ask the left and they will be more than happy to tell you. Today, the president has set up an official agency inside the White House to collect information on anyone who expresses any kind of doubt about his enlightened rule. Imagine if George W. Bush had done something similar to track anti-war protestors. I mean the outrage was at ridiculous levels when the Pentagon wanted to create a tracking database for terrorists.

Sadly, this should not come as a surprise to anyone who studies history. The Clintons had the FBI records of political enemies stashed in Hillary’s closet. Unfortunately tyranny is the normal state of humankind, freedom is the exception to the rule. We are seeing that more and more every day.

The thing is, this behavior actually shows we are winning. If the left really was winning the debate over health care, they would be focused on that, rather then being reduced to invoking the spector of Nazis and Hitler. Keep up the fight, don’t let them distress you. Remember that you, not the leftists, have the support of the American people. What evr you do, don’t let them shut you up. And report me to the White House, please.

Published in:Uncategorized |on August 10th, 2009 |No Comments »

Hail Pharoh Obama

Is it just me or is the fawning that Democrats constantly engage in over Barack Obama getting more and more ridiculous every day? I mean the man is not president in their eyes, he is a god king. I expect any day to see them handing him a crown of laurel leaves or a pschent on the steps of the Capital building.

Consider what we have seen in the last week. Hilary Clinton actually made  pilgramage to the grave of Obama’s grandfather while on a state visit to the African continent. Meanwhile Sen. Max Bacus (D-MT) is in Washington D.C. saying “it’s so wonderful to hear him speak. It’s like listening to a symphony. It’s like it was a great meal. He’s so good. . .” Do these people even care how the look to the American public?

It reminds me of the election when we had Chris Matthews, supposedly an objective journalist saying things like “I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often,” and “I’ve been following politics since I was about 5, I’ve never seen anything like this. This is bigger than Kennedy. He comes along, and he seems to have the answers. This is the New Testament. This is surprising.”

It also reminds me of the editor of Newsweek saying, supringly, to Chris Matthews, “well, we were the good guys in 1984. Hasn’t felt that way in recent years. We’re seen too often as a bad guys. And he is a very different job from Reagan was all about America, and he talked about it. Obama is, we are above that now. We’re not just parochial, we’re not just chauvinistic, we’re not just provincial. We stand for something. I mean, in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above the world. He’s sort of God.”

This is ridiculous. I have never in my life seen such a display. The only thing I can even find like this is the way the American people acted towards Abraham Lincoln after the Civil War. But at least Lincoln had actually done something to deserve the adoration. President Obama gives good speeches when his teleprompter gives them to him. What has he done to deserve the fawning adoration that he is reciving? He has done nothing. We are on the verge of creating America’s first king, and he has done nothing to make our country better. It’s time to kick the whole sycophantic lot out of there and take our country back.

Published in:Uncategorized |on August 6th, 2009 |No Comments »

Obama’s Ten Commandments

I got this in my e-mail today and it was so funny I had to share. The Patriotupdate.com website is the original source.

I. Thou shalt have no God in America, except for me. For we are no longer a Christian nation and, after all, I am the chosen One.

II. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, unless it is my face carved on Mt. Rushmore.

III. Thou shalt not utter my middle name in vain (or in public). Only I can say Barack Hussein Obama.

IV. Remember tax day, April 15th, to keep it holy.

V. Honour thy father and thy mother until they are too old and sick to care for. They will cost our public-funded health-care system too much money.

VI. Thou shalt not kill, unless you have an unwanted, unborn baby. For it would be an abomination to punish your daughter with a baby.

VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery if you are conservative or a Republican. Liberals and Democrats are hereby forgiven for all of their infidelity and immorality, but the careers of conservatives will be forever destroyed.

VIII. Thou shalt not steal, until you’ve been elected to public office. Only then is it acceptable to take money from hard-working, successful citizens and give it to those who do not work, illegal immigrants, or those who do not have the motivation to better their own lives.

IX. Thou shalt not discriminate against thy neighbor unless they are conservative, Caucasian, or Christian.

X. Thou shalt not covet because it is simply unnecessary. I will place such a heavy tax burden on those that have achieved the American Dream that, by the end of my term as President, nobody will have any wealth or material goods left for you to covet.

Published in:Uncategorized |on July 31st, 2009 |No Comments »

What’s The Rush Mister President?

The president and Congressional Democrats continue to try and rush socialized medicine into existence. Even though the plan would not take effect for six years, the plan must be passed right now. Why does it have to happen so fast? Because, according to Obama and others, the cost of waiting would be too high. The problem with that is that the plan would not take effect for SIX YEARS! Isn’t that waiting? Isn’t the price of the plan too high?

More importantly, does anyone really believe that the government can do health care better than it is being run now? Last night on The Daily Show, John Stewart tried to use that military and VA systems as examples of how state run health care is workable.  Basically he tried to say that government run health care will work because it works in the military.

Of course this entirely ignores the Walter Reed hospital scandal, which Barack Obama  tried to capitalize on during the campaign. Now, I have used the military health care system and I always had good experiences. Most people who deal with the military and the VA have good experiences. But the truth is that most people have good experiences with the civilian medical system as well. In fact, the latest polls show that 83% of Americans are happy with their insurance and oppose the so called public option.

So who are the uninsured that this plan is supposed to help? According to the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, the vast majority are people who live under 200% of the poverty level. Guess what, there are already government programs that are designed to provide insurance for this group of people. They are called Medicaid and SCHIP. This means that the principle group of people that the president claims to want to help are already covered by government programs.

The other major group of people who make up the so-called uninsured are what Democrats like to refer to as “undocumented workers.” However, here we refer to them by a more appropriate term, illegal immigrants. According to Census data, 70% of the uninsured people in America are illegal immigrants. This means that the Obama, Pelosi, Reid Trio want to use our tax money to pay for illegal immigrants to go to the doctor.

In truth, the reason that this has to get done right now is so that nobody has time to learn what is in the bill. Nancy Pelosi even said in a public appearance that she was considering not giving the traditional three days for Congress and the public to read the bill. Folks, this is not about health care or the uninsured. This is entirely about power. In reporting about a poll showing how unpopular the plan is NBC’s Andrea Mitchell went so far as to say that the people may not now what is good for them. As a student and teacher of history, I can tell you that the world has been down this road before. It did not end well for the world before. Don’t let us travel down this road again.

Published in:Uncategorized |on July 31st, 2009 |No Comments »

Advice To America

I want to share with you some sage advice for America. It isn’t anything that I wrote, but is exactly what this country needs to hear right now. Please share it with your friends.

George Washington’s
Farewell Address

To the People of the United States

FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:

1 The period for a new election of a citizen, to administer the executive government of the United States, being not far distant, and the time actually arrived, when your thoughts must be employed designating the person, who is to be clothed with that important trust, it appears to me proper, especially as it may conduce to a more distinct expression of the public voice, that I should now apprize you of the resolution I have formed, to decline being considered among the number of those out of whom a choice is to be made.

2 I beg you at the same time to do me the justice to be assured that this resolution has not been taken without a strict regard to all the considerations appertaining to the relation which binds a dutiful citizen to his country; and that in withdrawing the tender of service, which silence in my situation might imply, I am influenced by no diminution of zeal for your future interest, no deficiency of grateful respect for your past kindness, but am supported by a full conviction that the step is compatible with both.

3 The acceptance of, and continuance hitherto in, the office to which your suffrages have twice called me, have been a uniform sacrifice of inclination to the opinion of duty, and to a deference for what appeared to be your desire. I constantly hoped, that it would have been much earlier in my power, consistently with motives, which I was not at liberty to disregard, to return to that retirement, from which I had been reluctantly drawn. The strength of my inclination to do this, previous to the last election, had even led to the preparation of an address to declare it to you; but mature reflection on the then perplexed and critical posture of our affairs with foreign nations, and the unanimous advice of persons entitled to my confidence impelled me to abandon the idea.

4 I rejoice, that the state of your concerns, external as well as internal, no longer renders the pursuit of inclination incompatible with the sentiment of duty, or propriety; and am persuaded, whatever partiality may be retained for my services, that, in the present circumstances of our country, you will not disapprove my determination to retire.

5 The impressions, with which I first undertook the arduous trust, were explained on the proper occasion. In the discharge of this trust, I will only say, that I have, with good intentions, contributed towards the organization and administration of the government the best exertions of which a very fallible judgment was capable. Not unconscious, in the outset, of the inferiority of my qualifications, experience in my own eyes, perhaps still more in the eyes of others, has strengthened the motives to diffidence of myself; and every day the increasing weight of years admonishes me more and more, that the shade of retirement is as necessary to me as it will be welcome. Satisfied, that, if any circumstances have given peculiar value to my services, they were temporary, I have the consolation to believe, that, while choice and prudence invite me to quit the political scene, patriotism does not forbid it.

6 In looking forward to the moment, which is intended to terminate the career of my public life, my feelings do not permit me to suspend the deep acknowledgment of that debt of gratitude, which I owe to my beloved country for the many honors it has conferred upon me; still more for the steadfast confidence with which it has supported me; and for the opportunities I have thence enjoyed of manifesting my inviolable attachment, by services faithful and persevering, though in usefulness unequal to my zeal. If benefits have resulted to our country from these services, let it always be remembered to your praise, and as an instructive example in our annals, that under circumstances in which the passions, agitated in every direction, were liable to mislead, amidst appearances sometimes dubious, vicissitudes of fortune often discouraging, in situations in which not unfrequently want of success has countenanced the spirit of criticism, the constancy of your support was the essential prop of the efforts, and a guarantee of the plans by which they were effected. Profoundly penetrated with this idea, I shall carry it with me to my grave, as a strong incitement to unceasing vows that Heaven may continue to you the choicest tokens of its beneficence; that your union and brotherly affection may be perpetual; that the free constitution, which is the work of your hands, may be sacredly maintained; that its administration in every department may be stamped with wisdom and virtue; than, in fine, the happiness of the people of these States, under the auspices of liberty, may be made complete, by so careful a preservation and so prudent a use of this blessing, as will acquire to them the glory of recommending it to the applause, the affection, and adoption of every nation, which is yet a stranger to it.

7 Here, perhaps I ought to stop. But a solicitude for your welfare which cannot end but with my life, and the apprehension of danger, natural to that solicitude, urge me, on an occasion like the present, to offer to your solemn contemplation, and to recommend to your frequent review, some sentiments which are the result of much reflection, of no inconsiderable observation, and which appear to me all-important to the permanency of your felicity as a people. These will be offered to you with the more freedom, as you can only see in them the disinterested warnings of a parting friend, who can possibly have no personal motive to bias his counsel. Nor can I forget, as an encouragement to it, your indulgent reception of my sentiments on a former and not dissimilar occasion.

8 Interwoven as is the love of liberty with every ligament of your hearts, no recommendation of mine is necessary to fortify or confirm the attachment.

9 The unity of Government, which constitutes you one people, is also now dear to you. It is justly so; for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquillity at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very Liberty, which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee, that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is of infinite moment, that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national Union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the Palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion, that it can in any event be abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.

10 For this you have every inducement of sympathy and interest. Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of american, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of Patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles. You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together; the Independence and Liberty you possess are the work of joint counsels, and joint efforts, of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.

11 But these considerations, however powerfully they address themselves to your sensibility, are greatly outweighed by those, which apply more immediately to your interest. Here every portion of our country finds the most commanding motives for carefully guarding and preserving the Union of the whole.

12 The North, in an unrestrained intercourse with the South, protected by the equal laws of a common government, finds, in the productions of the latter, great additional resources of maritime and commercial enterprise and precious materials of manufacturing industry. The South, in the same intercourse, benefiting by the agency of the North, sees its agriculture grow and its commerce expand. Turning partly into its own channels the seamen of the North, it finds its particular navigation invigorated; and, while it contributes, in different ways, to nourish and increase the general mass of the national navigation, it looks forward to the protection of a maritime strength, to which itself is unequally adapted. The East, in a like intercourse with the West, already finds, and in the progressive improvement of interior communications by land and water, will more and more find, a valuable vent for the commodities which it brings from abroad, or manufactures at home. The West derives from the East supplies requisite to its growth and comfort, and, what is perhaps of still greater consequence, it must of necessity owe the secure enjoyment of indispensable outlets for its own productions to the weight, influence, and the future maritime strength of the Atlantic side of the Union, directed by an indissoluble community of interest as one nation. Any other tenure by which the West can hold this essential advantage, whether derived from its own separate strength, or from an apostate and unnatural connexion with any foreign power, must be intrinsically precarious.

13 While, then, every part of our country thus feels an immediate and particular interest in Union, all the parts combined cannot fail to find in the united mass of means and efforts greater strength, greater resource, proportionably greater security from external danger, a less frequent interruption of their peace by foreign nations; and, what is of inestimable value, they must derive from Union an exemption from those broils and wars between themselves, which so frequently afflict neighbouring countries not tied together by the same governments, which their own rivalships alone would be sufficient to produce, but which opposite foreign alliances, attachments, and intrigues would stimulate and embitter. Hence, likewise, they will avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments, which, under any form of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican Liberty. In this sense it is, that your Union ought to be considered as a main prop of your liberty, and that the love of the one ought to endear to you the preservation of the other.

14 These considerations speak a persuasive language to every reflecting and virtuous mind, and exhibit the continuance of the union as a primary object of Patriotic desire. Is there a doubt, whether a common government can embrace so large a sphere? Let experience solve it. To listen to mere speculation in such a case were criminal. We are authorized to hope, that a proper organization of the whole, with the auxiliary agency of governments for the respective subdivisions, will afford a happy issue to the experiment. It is well worth a fair and full experiment. With such powerful and obvious motives to Union, affecting all parts of our country, while experience shall not have demonstrated its impracticability, there will always be reason to distrust the patriotism of those, who in any quarter may endeavour to weaken its bands.

15 In contemplating the causes, which may disturb our Union, it occurs as matter of serious concern, that any ground should have been furnished for characterizing parties by Geographical discriminations, Northern and Southern, Atlantic and Western; whence designing men may endeavour to excite a belief, that there is a real difference of local interests and views. One of the expedients of party to acquire influence, within particular districts, is to misrepresent the opinions and aims of other districts. You cannot shield yourselves too much against the jealousies and heart-burnings, which spring from these misrepresentations; they tend to render alien to each other those, who ought to be bound together by fraternal affection. The inhabitants of our western country have lately had a useful lesson on this head; they have seen, in the negotiation by the Executive, and in the unanimous ratification by the Senate, of the treaty with Spain, and in the universal satisfaction at that event, throughout the United States, a decisive proof how unfounded were the suspicions propagated among them of a policy in the General Government and in the Atlantic States unfriendly to their interests in regard to the mississippi; they have been witnesses to the formation of two treaties, that with Great Britain, and that with Spain, which secure to them every thing they could desire, in respect to our foreign relations, towards confirming their prosperity. Will it not be their wisdom to rely for the preservation of these advantages on the union by which they were procured? Will they not henceforth be deaf to those advisers, if such there are, who would sever them from their brethren, and connect them with aliens?

16 To the efficacy and permanency of your Union, a Government for the whole is indispensable. No alliances, however strict, between the parts can be an adequate substitute; they must inevitably experience the infractions and interruptions, which all alliances in all times have experienced. Sensible of this momentous truth, you have improved upon your first essay, by the adoption of a Constitution of Government better calculated than your former for an intimate Union, and for the efficacious management of your common concerns. This Government, the offspring of our own choice, uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true Liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish Government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established Government.

17 All obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests.

18 However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines, which have lifted them to unjust dominion.

19 Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the constitution, alterations, which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown. In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments, as of other human institutions; that experience is the surest standard, by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution of a country; that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion; and remember, especially, that, for the efficient management of our common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.

20 I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party, generally.

21 This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

22 The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.

23 Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

24 It serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

25 There is an opinion, that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the Government, and serve to keep alive the spirit of Liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in Governments of a Monarchical cast, Patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And, there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

26 It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution, in those intrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the Guardian of the Public Weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way, which the constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield.

27 Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

28 It is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who, that is a sincere friend to it, can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric ?

29 Promote, then, as an object of primary importance, institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened.

30 As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is, to use it as sparingly as possible; avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of peace to discharge the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen, which we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate. To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that towards the payment of debts there must be Revenue; that to have Revenue there must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised, which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant; that the intrinsic embarrassment, inseparable from the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties), ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue, which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.

31 Observe good faith and justice towards all Nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and Morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great Nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt, that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages, which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be, that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a Nation with its Virtue? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices ?

32 In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential, than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The Nation, which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The Nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the Government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The Government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times, it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of Nations has been the victim.

33 So likewise, a passionate attachment of one Nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite Nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the Nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

34 As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practise the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the Public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.

35 Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens,) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove, that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

36 The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connexion as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.

37 Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

38 Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people, under an efficient government, the period is not far off, when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality, we may at any time resolve upon, to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.

39 Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?

40 It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

41 Taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

42 Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing, with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied, as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view, that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.

43 In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the strong and lasting impression I could wish; that they will control the usual current of the passions, or prevent our nation from running the course, which has hitherto marked the destiny of nations. But, if I may even flatter myself, that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your welfare, by which they have been dictated.

44 How far in the discharge of my official duties, I have been guided by the principles which have been delineated, the public records and other evidences of my conduct must witness to you and to the world. To myself, the assurance of my own conscience is, that I have at least believed myself to be guided by them.

45 In relation to the still subsisting war in Europe, my Proclamation of the 22d of April 1793, is the index to my Plan. Sanctioned by your approving voice, and by that of your Representatives in both Houses of Congress, the spirit of that measure has continually governed me, uninfluenced by any attempts to deter or divert me from it.

46 After deliberate examination, with the aid of the best lights I could obtain, I was well satisfied that our country, under all the circumstances of the case, had a right to take, and was bound in duty and interest to take, a neutral position. Having taken it, I determined, as far as should depend upon me, to maintain it, with moderation, perseverance, and firmness.

47 The considerations, which respect the right to hold this conduct, it is not necessary on this occasion to detail. I will only observe, that, according to my understanding of the matter, that right, so far from being denied by any of the Belligerent Powers, has been virtually admitted by all.

48 The duty of holding a neutral conduct may be inferred, without any thing more, from the obligation which justice and humanity impose on every nation, in cases in which it is free to act, to maintain inviolate the relations of peace and amity towards other nations.

49 The inducements of interest for observing that conduct will best be referred to your own reflections and experience. With me, a predominant motive has been to endeavour to gain time to our country to settle and mature its yet recent institutions, and to progress without interruption to that degree of strength and consistency, which is necessary to give it, humanly speaking, the command of its own fortunes.

50 Though, in reviewing the incidents of my administration, I am unconscious of intentional error, I am nevertheless too sensible of my defects not to think it probable that I may have committed many errors. Whatever they may be, I fervently beseech the Almighty to avert or mitigate the evils to which they may tend. I shall also carry with me the hope, that my Country will never cease to view them with indulgence; and that, after forty-five years of my life dedicated to its service with an upright zeal, the faults of incompetent abilities will be consigned to oblivion, as myself must soon be to the mansions of rest.

51 Relying on its kindness in this as in other things, and actuated by that fervent love towards it, which is so natural to a man, who views it in the native soil of himself and his progenitors for several generations; I anticipate with pleasing expectation that retreat, in which I promise myself to realize, without alloy, the sweet enjoyment of partaking, in the midst of my fellow-citizens, the benign influence of good laws under a free government, the ever favorite object of my heart, and the happy reward, as I trust, of our mutual cares, labors, and dangers.

George Washington
United States – September 17, 1796

Published in:Uncategorized |on July 24th, 2009 |1 Comment »

Dictator Pelosi Shuts Down GOP Opposition

This is how the AP is reporting the situation in Washington D.C. “In their zeal to protect their members from politically hazardous votes on issues such as gay marriage and gun control, Democrats running the House of Representativesare taking extraordinary steps to muzzle Republicans in this summer’s debates on spending bills.” That’s right, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has clamped down on a decades old policy of allowing annual appropriations bills come to the floor with an open amendments process. This is despite the Democrats vigorously defending this procedure when they were in the minority.

What this means is that 0nly 60 of the 435 members of the House will have any input on these bills. It also proves that any talk of bipartisanship by Speaker Pelosi and her gang is a bunch of nonsense. They are not interested in working with Republicans, they are only interested in pushing through a radical agend, that they know is not popular with the American public.

Consider what the issues are that the Democrats don’t want members voting on. Abortion, gay marriage, gun control, medical marijuana, school vouchers, and a host of others. The logical assumption is that the items that Democrats would be inclined to vote for, like abortion or gay marriage just aren’t popular with the American public, while issues they would vote against, like school vouchers, are. The Democrats don’t want thir members having to defend unpopular votes while trying to portray themselves as a populist, middle of the road party.

More importantly though, it shows that the Democrats are concerned first and formost with power. It is clearly more important than their beliefs, or they would be willing to take a stand on these issues, even if they believed that it would hurt them. Of course not every Democrat feels this way. Some Democrats, like Rep. Bart Stupak D-Michigan, have been publicly criticizing Speaker Pelosi for this move. Rep. Stupak says that new policy “muzzles the voices of pro-life members,” and sends a message that Democrats better tow the party, aka Pelosi, line,or be left out in the cold.

Folks, you need to make sure that everyone you know hears about this. I don’t care if you are Republican or Democrat, it should chill you to the bone that a party would put power before principle. The Republicans did this a few years ago and their supporters withdrew their support and the Democrats were given their chance to lead. Now Nancy Pelosi has crossed that threshold and  it is the duty of all good citizens, regardless of party or ideology , to throw her and her crew out and replace them with people who will stand up for their beliefs, what ever they are.

Published in:Uncategorized |on July 16th, 2009 |No Comments »